bla blaaahh
19.2.2014 19:21
Harhaanjohtavuuksia ja ihan päinvastasia osotettu vaikka millä mitalla....
http://archive.lifenews.com/
>"The average age of diagnoses of breast cancer in America is 61 years old," Schlafly told WorldNetDaily. "But the average age of participants in this study was only 42 years old, too young for the average person to develop breast cancer."
"This study is as meaningless as drawing conclusions about heart disease by looking at teenagers," he added, explaining that the study "deliberately excluded women who had had abortions and then died from breast cancer.">
>"The research data show that abortion causes a sharp increase in the deadly PR-negative breast cancer," Schlafly told the news site. "The press reports concealed this alarming result, making it look like abortion is safe. The report's abstract concealed this important result also."
He also said the researchers excluded women who developed breast cancer early in the study.
"So those who were hurt most by their abortions were excluded, and this skewed the results towards a claim that abortion is safe," he said.
Some of the other problems Schlafly pointed out included not following up on women who left blank answers about previous abortions, confusion in wording on the forms between abortions and spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), and that none of the researchers involved are oncologists (one was a nutritionist).>
>A few years ago, the British Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists confirmed Brind's study and said it contained no major flaws or errors.>
http://canadasilentnomore.com/
> 70 worldwide studies have independently linked induced abortion with breast cancer! Thirteen out of fifteen studies conducted on American women report increased risk. Seventeen studies are statistically significant, showing increased risk.>
mikset tivaa
20.2.2014 14:26
http://archive.lifenews.com/
>"The average age of diagnoses of breast cancer in America is 61 years old," Schlafly told WorldNetDaily. "But the average age of participants in this study was only 42 years old, too young for the average person to develop breast cancer."
"This study is as meaningless as drawing conclusions about heart disease by looking at teenagers," he added, explaining that the study "deliberately excluded women who had had abortions and then died from breast cancer.">
>"The research data show that abortion causes a sharp increase in the deadly PR-negative breast cancer," Schlafly told the news site. "The press reports concealed this alarming result, making it look like abortion is safe. The report's abstract concealed this important result also."
He also said the researchers excluded women who developed breast cancer early in the study.
"So those who were hurt most by their abortions were excluded, and this skewed the results towards a claim that abortion is safe," he said.
Some of the other problems Schlafly pointed out included not following up on women who left blank answers about previous abortions, confusion in wording on the forms between abortions and spontaneous abortions (miscarriages), and that none of the researchers involved are oncologists (one was a nutritionist).>
>A few years ago, the British Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists confirmed Brind's study and said it contained no major flaws or errors.>
http://canadasilentnomore.com/
> 70 worldwide studies have independently linked induced abortion with breast cancer! Thirteen out of fifteen studies conducted on American women report increased risk. Seventeen studies are statistically significant, showing increased risk.>
mikset tivaa
20.2.2014 14:26
"Mistä sä tiedät että just nää prolife- tutkimukset on muita oikeempia ja pätevämpiä?"
alottajalta samaa? Sehän tän väittämisen on alottanu. Ainiin, eihän suosijat voi olla koskaan väärässä... ;)
kitikatti
20.2.2014 15:34
21.2.2014 20:50
alottajalta samaa? Sehän tän väittämisen on alottanu. Ainiin, eihän suosijat voi olla koskaan väärässä... ;)
kitikatti
20.2.2014 15:34
Moi sosiologi. Kertoisitko mistä tiedät, että nää sun tuomat
tutkimustulokset ovat pätevämpiä kuin prolife-tutkimukset aiheesta?
(*Huom., hyvä hyvä... joskus suosijat tivaa omaltakin sakiltaan!)
seliseliseli...21.2.2014 20:50
"Niillä kun ei "kumota" mitään."
Siis sun kiistomutuillas...? XDDD Ja mitähän toi sunkaan piiiiitkä sivuraiteille harhakoiva seliselittelys oli todistavinaan? Paitsi epätoivos kun et vaan pystyny taaskaan todistaan sitä mitä oisit niin kiihkeesti halunnu.... ja jopa se oma tutukimussakkis on eri mieltä sun kans.
Siis sun kiistomutuillas...? XDDD Ja mitähän toi sunkaan piiiiitkä sivuraiteille harhakoiva seliselittelys oli todistavinaan? Paitsi epätoivos kun et vaan pystyny taaskaan todistaan sitä mitä oisit niin kiihkeesti halunnu.... ja jopa se oma tutukimussakkis on eri mieltä sun kans.
Ei kommentteja:
Lähetä kommentti